Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Gigante vs Kyrian Jacquet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gigante vs Jacquet analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Matteo Gigante vs Kyrian Jacquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 0 Jacquet
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gigante has won 50.56% of points on their second serve, while Jacquet has won 50.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gigante, in recent form, has won 50.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jacquet has won 53.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.49% and 31.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gigante has saved 60.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jacquet has saved 62.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gigante has won 63.08% of matches played (W/L 41/ 24), with Jacquet winning 56.52% (W/L 26/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 40/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20). Jacquet has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 44/ 28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 35/ 15), where as Jacquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.52% of matches (W/L 25/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gigante winning 1 times and Jacquet being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Jacquet winning 0. The last match between Gigante and Jacquet was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2024, Q1 round, Grass with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-4 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gigante and Jacquet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gigante winning 0 times and Jacquet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gigante winning 1, and Jacquet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gigante has played against opponents with an average rank of 319.55 while Jacquet has played against players with an average rank of 272.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gigante has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jacquet has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gigante has converted 42.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jacquet has converted 44.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
135
Rank
132
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
239
Rank
191
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
59% (129-89)
Career Total W/L
57% (164-126)
68% (28-13)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$70,440
Career Prize Money
$92,650
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matteo Gigante vs Kyrian Jacquet For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gigante VS Jacquet
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Kyrian Jacquet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) | 59% (48/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (33/42) | 69% (33/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (17/24) | 56% (19/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (30/82) | 24% (16/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Kyrian Jacquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (28/13) | 56% (10/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (57/38) | 54% (22/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (474/419) | 53% (203/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (18/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 165 | 76 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 169 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.61 | 240.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1767/2845) | 55% (677/1234) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1220/1767) | 70% (477/677) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (545/1078) | 51% (284/557) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (127/297) | 45% (51/114) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1168/2868) | 40% (502/1246) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (3/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 81% (22/5) | 64% (9/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (28/41) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 92% (12/13) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 37% (19/7) | 14% (7/1) |
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Matteo Gigante
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Matteo Gigante
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Matteo Gigante
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Gianluca Bellezza
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Matteo Gigante
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyrian Jacquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Quentin Halys
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
44
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Carlos Taberner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
108)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Gabriel Debru
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Gauthier Onclin
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(4) 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Gigante Vs Jacquet Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gigante are available here and Jacquet photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Matteo Gigante
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kyrian Jacquet
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
